Three assumptions of radiometric dating updating startup caches
Radiometric dating methods are the strongest direct evidence that geologists have for the age of the Earth.All these methods point to Earth being very, very old -- several billions of years old.Protons and neutrons together are called nucleons, meaning particles that can appear in the atomic nucleus.A nuclide of an element, also called an isotope of an element, is an atom of that element that has a specific number of nucleons.
When I first became interested in the creation-evolution debate, in late 1994, I looked around for sources that clearly and simply explained what radiometric dating is and why young-Earth creationists are driven to discredit it.
By measuring how long it takes for an unstable element to decay into a stable element and by measuring how much daughter element has been produced by the parent element within a specimen of rock, scientists believe they are able to determine the age of the rock.
This belief is based upon three significant assumptions.
The only dating methods discussed (over and over) by evolution-believing scientists and the mass media are those that supposedly "prove" that the earth is billions of years old.
One of the most popular of these is known as radiometric dating. can be In other words, something in the past caused a significant amount of helium to build up inside these zircons (such as from a rapid decay episode of uranium), yet, in spite of the fact that helium has been observed to leak out readily from these zircons, it has not done so: simply because it hasn't had enough time to do so -- suggesting that the zircons themselves are only a few thousand years old."There is evidence to show ...